If we're picking people to draw out of their own conscience and experience a 'new' Constitution, we should not look principally for good lawyers. We should look to people who agree with us. When we are in that mode, you realize we have rendered the Constitution useless.
Antonin Scalia, a renowned jurist and Supreme Court Justice, expresses his skepticism about the ability of ordinary citizens to interpret the Constitution. He argues that the Constitution's meaning is not self-evident and requires expertise to understand. Scalia's statement highlights the importance of judicial interpretation in ensuring the Constitution's effectiveness.
Scalia's quote emphasizes the need for specialized knowledge and expertise in interpreting the Constitution. He suggests that relying solely on personal conscience and experience is insufficient for understanding the Constitution's meaning.
Scalia's statement reflects the ongoing debate about the role of the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution. This debate has been ongoing since the founding of the United States, with some arguing that the Constitution's meaning is fixed and others advocating for a more dynamic and evolving interpretation.
Antonin Scalia was a prominent American jurist and Supreme Court Justice. He served on the Court from 1986 to 2016 and was known for his strong conservative views and his commitment to originalism, the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning.
Scalia's statement highlights the importance of judicial interpretation in ensuring the Constitution's effectiveness. It underscores the need for specialized knowledge and expertise in understanding the Constitution's meaning, which can have significant implications for legal decisions and policy-making.
Scalia's statement has been criticized by those who argue that the Constitution's meaning should be determined by the people, rather than by judges. Others have questioned the legitimacy of judicial interpretation, arguing that it is an exercise of raw power rather than a legitimate exercise of judicial authority.